Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Akinci, B, Kiziltas, S, Ergen, E, Karaesmen, I Z and Keceli, F (2006) Modeling and Analyzing the Impact of Technology on Data Capture and Transfer Processes at Construction Sites: A Case Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1148–57.

Bai, Y and Burkett, W R (2006) Rapid Bridge Replacement: Processes, Techniques, and Needs for Improvements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1139–47.

Col Debella, D and Ries, R (2006) Construction Delivery Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Their Performance within School Districts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1131–8.

Gao, Z, Walters, R C, Jaselskis, E J and Wipf, T J (2006) Approaches to Improving the Quality of Construction Drawings from Owner’s Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1187–92.

Li, J, Moselhi, O and Alkass, S (2006) Forecasting Project Status by Using Fuzzy Logic. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1193–202.

Lu, M, Poon, C and Wong, L (2006) Application Framework for Mapping and Simulation of Waste Handling Processes in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1212–21.

Srour, I M, Haas, C T and Morton, D P (2006) Linear Programming Approach to Optimize Strategic Investment in the Construction Workforce. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1158–66.

Telem, D, Laufer, A and Shapira, A (2006) Only Dynamics Can Absorb Dynamics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1167–77.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction management; Construction sites; Dynamic characteristics; Environmental issues; Project management;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:11(1167)
  • Abstract:
    A study conducted in Israel, among ten excellent on-site construction project managers (PMs), examined the ways in which they cope with the dynamic project environment of the modern construction site (complex, uncertain, and fast). Empirical data gathered by means of structured observations led to the development of the Star Model, which offers a multidimensional description of the dynamic patterns of the managers’ activities, namely, their managerial dynamics. In addition, characterization of the level of environment dynamics with which managers were required to cope in their work, led to the identification of a tentative relationship between contextual conditions that characterize the project environment and the level of managerial dynamics practiced by the managers. This tentative relation, which basically suggests that managers should adapt their level of managerial dynamics to the level of dynamics they find on-site, apparently holds one of the keys to the managers’ excellent job performance.

Yu, A T W, Shen, Q, Kelly, J and Hunter, K (2006) Investigation of Critical Success Factors in Construction Project Briefing by Way of Content Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1178–86.

Zhang, X (2006) Markov-Based Optimization Model for Building Facilities Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(11), 1203–11.